Save Online law articles on social network:

Employment hope, despite cooling in on-campus recruiting

The New York Times ran an article on Tuesday titled “Downturn Dims Prospects Even at Top Law Schools.” It was reported that at many top tier law schools, on-campus interviews are down by a third to a half compared with a year ago. Far fewer law firms are interviewing on campus, and those that remain are offering a reduced number of positions. Two second-year students, both with over $200K in debt, lament in the article that, absent an offer from a big law firm, they don’t know how they’ll manage.

KU Law has experienced a similar cooling in on-campus recruiting, as the number of our fall on-campus employers has fallen by over one-third from a total of 72 in the fall of 2008. Several employers that consistently recruit on campus will forego all on-campus interviewing in 2009-10. Others registered for fall interviews but later withdrew, citing economic uncertainty. There remains a small group of undecided employers. I anticipate that at least 10-12 will ultimately choose to participate in our fall program, so at best we’ll top out at approximately 50 fall on-campus employers.

The employers who do participate will be offering fewer summer clerkship opportunities than in past years, and the acceptance rate of their offers will be high.

Students who do not receive offers from on-campus employers should not despair. KU Law has always offered a top-notch, affordable legal education, and most students accrue far less debt than their peers at NYU and Penn who are quoted in the Times. In uncertain economic times, graduating from law school with a manageable debt load is of heightened importance. When jobs are less abundant, it pays to have the financial flexibility to accept a summer or full-time position that offers a good opportunity to gain marketable experience, if not a fat paycheck.

To weather this economic storm, students will be encouraged to gain experience through our excellent law school clinics, with small and mid-sized law firms and government agencies, at corporations where their legal skills may be viewed as a plus, and with judges.

It is also important to note two facts:

(1) Since 2000, the percentage of KU Law grads who attribute their full-time job to a fall on-campus interview has averaged just under 20 percent.
(2) Law firms in the 2-25 attorney range have accounted for over 50 percent of law firm hiring of KU Law grads in six of the last nine years.

Fall on-campus interviewing is not the only way to find a legal job after graduation. It represents a piece of the overall puzzle. And large law firms, even in a robust economy, do not represent the entirety of a student’s employment options.

Todd Rogers
Assistant Dean for Career Services
Read more from this post in Online law articles »

F-bomb-dropping attorney gets worldwide notoriety

Most of this article and the buzz surrounding this incident (see below) is about lawyer civility and its supposed decline since the "good old days". It also serves as a reminder that many voicemail systems make messages very portable. Some systems send messages as e-mails with a .wav attachment. A breeze to forward far and wide. Not only should you be careful about what you leave on someone's message machine (see the Federal Privacy Commissioner's finding against a bank on this subject: PIPED Act Case Summary #270: Bank agrees to modify automated message), but you should remember that they can be easily saved and fowarded to goodness only knows where.

F-bomb-dropping attorney gets worldwide notoriety

August 25, 2004

BY ERIC HERMAN - Business Reporter

So much for professional courtesy.

A Chicago lawyer's expletive-filled phone message circulating on the Internet is providing fresh evidence to those who say lawyers' standards of behavior are eroding. ..."



The voice mail message (along with some commentary) is posted on on KinsellaLaw, for the curious.

Thanks to Bag and Baggage for leading me to this...

Read more from this post in Online law articles »

Article: Credit-card processors gear up for new privacy law

I find it amazing that when I closely examine the detritus of daily life (by emptying my pockets at the end of the day), I discover that so many merchants still print all the digits of the card number on credit and debit card receipts. Why? Why? Why? There is simply no need to have that info there and by it threatens the privacy of the cardholders.

The problem is usually compounded by a pretty cavalier attitude toward these flimsy pieces of paper. How many times have I picked up someone's reciept from the check-out at the grocery store, only to find a full credit card number, complete with expiry date? Or a full debit card number? When I mention it to the clerk, they just chuck it in the garbage. If you want to commit fraud, I can tell you the dumpsters to dive in.

PIPEDA, thanks to its broad statement that you must secure personal information against accidental disclosure, etc., probably requires obscuring at least part of the number. But not enough retailers have read it. At least the US is taking this seriously. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act requires card "truncation" by January 1 and some state laws have mandated it for some time:

Credit-card processors gear up for new privacy law:

"By Marion Davis, Staff Writer



A federal law requires merchants to truncate personal information on credit card receipts by Jan. 1. Does your business take credit cards? If so, when the slip prints out, how much of the customer's card number is included? If it's more than the last five digits, and/or if the expiration date shows, you need to upgrade your terminal by Jan. 1.

A federal law passed last December, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, requires credit-card "truncation" by that date, and a new state law makes merchants liable, starting in 2007, for any resulting fraud, plus legal fees, if they don't comply.

Some states, starting with California, have been gradually implementing truncation mandates for new terminals since 2001, but it was only last January that the first laws affecting existing machines kicked in. Some are tougher than Rhode Islandos: In Maine, anyone who didn't switch by last Jan. 1 is already subject to a $1,000 penalty; in Arizona, as of June 1, merchants who don't truncate can be fined $10,000. "



I gather that Visa/Mastercard have made this mandatory for their Canadian retailers by 2005.

Read more from this post in Online law articles »

3d DCA Watch -- When Granny Gets Mad, Run for the Hills!


Hi folks, it's that time of the week, so let's dive right in and see what our merry band of appellate judges to the south are up to in this week's edition of 3d DCA Watch:

Weiss v. Courshon

Hooray! Judge Salter is back, he's sick of crappy pro se pleadings, and he's not afraid to say so in the utmost polite, classy and professional manner that stands in stark contrast to certain cranky more senior judges that shall remain nameless but which have last names that rhyme with "warts."

Specifically, in a longstanding estate battle that SSD's Alvin Davis has been handling since he put on his first bow tie several decades ago, Judge Salter removed the pro se appellant's case from the oral calendar, found her arguments to be frivolous, and affirmed the lower court's dismissal for lack of prosecution with this lovely send off:
Weiss’s intemperate briefs in this case, as in prior cases, urge us to believe her and not the record. She expects this Court to believe, for example, that the circuit court clerk’s office docketed a non-existent notice to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute; that only the on-line docket, and not the notice itself, alerted her to correspond with the court (over a week before the hearing) and send a local attorney to review the court file for a docketed notice that was not in the file; that opposing counsel somehow tricked the trial judge’s judicial assistant and a court reporter on the morning of the scheduled hearing; that a highly-respected trial judge made an incorrect notation on the order of dismissal regarding a telephone call to a number that Weiss supplied; and that, given another decade or so, Weiss might ultimately come to Florida to prosecute her inflammatory complaint launched so many years ago. Suffice it to say that none of these suggestions is grounded in the record.

As Judge Winifred Sharp noted several years ago in another case involving a “frequent applicant” to her court: “This case reminds me of my grandmother’s final warning and admonition to me and my siblings as children, when we had exhausted her patience with our doings. ‘Enough is enough,’ she would say. And that was the end of it.”
I guess it was better to end that tender and heartwarming anecdote right there, because if I recall that opinion correctly here's what happened next:

"Then Granny would take out her jug of triple-x moonshine, make us get some switches from the cellar, and chase us around the cee-ment pond swigging her white lightning and smacking our behinds until she done nearly whacked our entire backsides back to Tennessee! Sooeee Granny, you're one ornery son of a gun!"
Read more from this post in Online law articles »

Congratulations Laurie!!

Uber-appellate lawyer Laurie Waldman Ross has been appointed to the 3d DCA Judicial Nominating Commission.

Hey, whaddaya know, sometimes they do get things right!
Read more from this post in Online law articles »

Article: Blawgs may be worth a try

I just discovered an article about Canadian lawyers' blogs from Canada Law Book. It mentions this blog, but I didn't know about it when it came out in June. And I'm not too offended that the author didn't get my name right.

Blawgs may be worth a try

...

"The marketing advantage of blawgs are that they put your name out there," says Girard. "If a blawg is reasonably well read, it will move up pretty quickly in the Google rankings."

Aficionados estimate that there are currently about 500 law-related blogs online in the United States, which indicates the trend is still in its infancy. Interested readers can search them out by going to www.blawg.org

In Canada, an initial Law Times search turned up only Girard's site (www.e-Lawg.com). Later searches found a few more: one for a lawyer in Nova Scotia on elder law (www.nselderlaw.ca), one on privacy law from David T.S. Cooper FRASER at McInnes Cooper in Atlantic Canada (pipeda.blogspot.com), Martin G. Ertl in B.C. has two, www.opinionated.ca and another called Boiler-plate (contract.matinertl.ca), which is "dedicated to elegant drafting in contracts."

Michael Crawford, a marketing and communications consultant with marketingdept.biz in Toronto, thinks he knows why there are so few in Canada.



Read the full article here.

Read more from this post in Online law articles »

Article: Watch those attachments!

Another helpful reminder from a (hopefully remorseful and sheepish) organizer of the Rupublican convention that you need to double-check your attachments before clicking send.

E-mail to volunteers gets a bit personal

BY DEBORAH S. MORRIS

STAFF WRITER

August 26, 2004

Oops! A welcome e-mail that was sent to hundreds of volunteers for the Republican National Convention inadvertently included the name, address, Social Security number, race and other personal information of those volunteers.

The e-mail, with a subject header of "Transportation Volunteer Information - Final Email Before Your Arrival to NYC," was sent out yesterday across the country and apparently was to serve as a checklist for transportation volunteers' arrival on Saturday.

At the end of the e-mail, two attachments, which when opened, display private information such as volunteers' home, work and mobile phone numbers as well as their birthdates, rooming information and other personal information. The information, if it landed in the wrong hands, would be a security concern.

"The attachment was inadvertent," Leonardo Alcivar, spokesman for the Republican National Convention, said yesterday. "As a precaution, security [personnel] has been alerted and will take any additional steps necessary to protect the integrity of anyone listed."

...



Thanks to PrivacySpot for the pointer.

Read more from this post in Online law articles »
Info recommended by: Webpages of law and Law articles

© Online law articles