Cabballes finally came out and rubber-stamped drug dog searches without any kind of legitimate suspicion at all. I've only had time to give the ruling a quick reading but it appears to be embarrassingly poorly reasoned.
More later . . .
Popular Posts
-
A blogger from India has posted an e-mail of complaint that he sent to his cellular phone company, complaining about its collection practice...
-
1) All the death penalties in California which reached the State supreme court were affirmed . 2) Now English courts are text messaging fi...
-
The Canadian Department of Public Security has been involved in a trial of facial recognition software that, they hope, will be used to mat...
-
Were they really that good? This piece about the release of former Miami-Dade County judge Harvey Shenberg got me thinking: Released from f... -
Click on the Logo to find the rss for the PodCast. Click on the Title above it for a direct download. HINT: Rather than downloading the enti...
-
Ok I'll admit it -- I owned one of those memberships at Cefalo's Wine Cellar. What can I say -- I liked the ambiance, the downstai... -
Australia's new privacy commissioner, Karen Curtis, is planning to take a more business-friendly approach to her position than her succe...
-
Hi kids, let's dive straight into 3d DCA world: Del Pino vs. FIU : This one is a headscratcher, an appeal over a whistleblower suit in w... -
I've heard of this happening in Canada, but it has not been widely reported on. The Telegraph has a very good article on the issues rela...
-
So let's see what happened yesterday in the new batch of opinions released by the 3d DCA, available to all appellate junkies here . As u...
© Online law articles: Dog Non-Searches
0 comments:
Post a Comment